Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35531765›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2022

A permutation procedure to detect heterogeneous treatment effects in randomized clinical trials while controlling the type I error rate.

Jack M Wolf, Joseph S Koopmeiners, David M Vock

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Practical guidance on modeling choices for the virtual twins method.Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Adjuvant Therapy after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Who Needs It?: Multi-institution Worldwide Observational Study.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jack M WolfDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8919-8740
Joseph S KoopmeinersDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
David M VockDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

VERY LOW NICOTINE CIGARETTES IN SMOKERS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIAU54DA031659 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DONNY, ERIC CHRISTIAN · 2011 to 2022
$64.7M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Innovative Statistical Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Tobacco Product StandardsR01DA046320 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Joseph S. Koopmeiners, David M. Vock · 2018 to 2026
$2.4M
SMART-ACT: Spatial Methodologic Approaches for Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Adaptation in Cancer TreatmentR01CA214825 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CANAHUATE, GUADALUPE, FULLER, CLIFTON DAVID · 2017 to 2019
$1.1M
QuBBD: Precision E –Radiomics for Dynamic Big Head & Neck Cancer Data R01CA225190 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CANAHUATE, GUADALUPE, FULLER, CLIFTON DAVID · 2017 to 2019
$776k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCI NIH HHS R01 CA214825NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225190NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046320NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA031659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsSecondary analyses of randomized clinical trials often seek to identify subgroups with differential treatment effects. These discoveries can help guide individual treatment decisions based on patient characteristics and identify populations for which additional treatments are needed. Traditional analyses require researchers to pre-specify potential subgroups to reduce the risk of reporting spurious results. There is a need for methods that can detect such subgroups without

methodsWe propose a permutation procedure for tuning parameter selection that allows for type I error control when testing for heterogeneous treatment effects framed within the Virtual Twins procedure for subgroup identification. We verify that the type I error rate can be controlled at the nominal rate and investigate the power for detecting heterogeneous effects when present through extensive simulation studies. We apply our method to a secondary analysis of data from a randomized trial of very low nicotine content cigarettes.

resultsIn the absence of type I error control, the observed type I error rate for Virtual Twins was between 99% and 100%. In contrast, models tuned via the proposed permutation were able to control the type I error rate and detect heterogeneous effects when present. An application of our approach to a recently completed trial of very low nicotine content cigarettes identified several variables with potentially heterogeneous treatment effects.

conclusionsThe proposed permutation procedure allows researchers to engage in secondary analyses of clinical trials for treatment effect heterogeneity while maintaining the type I error rate without pre-specifying subgroups.

Indexed as

NicotineResearch DesignComputer SimulationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicNicotinePermutation testsubgroup identificationtreatment effect heterogeneitytype I errorvirtual twins

Identifiers

PMID35531765
PMCPMC9529771
OpenAlexW4229363827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.