ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2022
The perceived work environment and well-being: A survey of emergency health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Influencing Factors of Nurses' Well-Being in Critical Care During Pandemic Era: A Systematic Review.Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.)Pooled it
- Care Aides Compassion Fatigue, Burnout, and Compassion Satisfaction Related to Long-Term Care (LTC) Working Environment.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026Article
- COVID-19 pandemic in minor psychiatric disorders among mobile emergency service workers: cohort.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2026Article
- National Evaluation of Emergency Medical Services Clinician Burnout and Workforce-Reducing Factors.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025Article
- Identifying the Key Factors Influencing Risk Perception Among Healthcare Workers in the Context of Disasters; A Systematic Review.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2025Review
- Influencing physician distribution through education: a qualitative study on retention in Japan's rural hospitals.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Emergency department workforces' experiences and perceptions of well-being from an international perspective: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Article
- Association between Workplace Bullying, Job Stress, and Professional Quality of Life in Nurses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The COVID-19 ambulance response assessment (CARA) study: a national survey of ambulance service healthcare professionals' preparedness and response to the COVID-19 pandemic.British paramedic journal · 2024Article
- Newly Acquired Burnout During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Retrospective Cohort Study on the Experiences of New York State Primary Care Clinicians.Journal of community health · 2024Article
- Occupational stress profiles of prehospital and clinical staff in emergency medicine-a cross-sectional baseline study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Emergency Nurses' Well-Being in Magnet Hospitals and Recommendations for Improvements in Work Environments: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Journal of emergency nursing · 2024Observational
- Nurses' Personality Traits and Perceived Work Environments During Public Health Emergencies: Implications for Nursing Workforce Planning.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
- Learning Lessons for Future Preparedness: Exploring Work Well-Being-Related Leadership Challenges among Paramedics during the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Qualitative Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2023Article
- Multidimensional stressors and protective factors shaping physicians' work environments and work-related well-being in two large US cities during COVID-19.American journal of industrial medicine · 2023Article
- Increased Job Burnout and Reduced Job Satisfaction for Nurses Compared to Other Healthcare Workers after the COVID-19 Pandemic.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2023Article
- Risk perception in the era of COVID-19 and related factors among nurses: A cross-sectional study.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Influence of Previous Mental State on Psychological Outcomes of Spanish Out-of-Hospital Professionals during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Fear of making a mistake: a prominent cause of stress for COVID-19 ICU staff-a mixed-methods study.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, health care provider well-being was affected by various challenges in the work environment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the perceived work environment and mental well-being of a sample of emergency physicians (EPs), emergency medicine (EM) nurses, and emergency medical services (EMS) providers during the pandemic.
methodsWe surveyed attending EPs, resident EPs, EM nurses, and EMS providers from 10 academic sites across the United States. We used latent class analysis (LCA) to estimate the effect of the perceived work environment on screening positive for depression/anxiety and burnout controlling for respondent characteristics. We tested possible predictors in the multivariate regression models and included the predictors that were significant in the final model.
resultsOur final sample included 701 emergency health care workers. Almost 23% of respondents screened positive for depression/anxiety and 39.7% for burnout. Nurses were significantly more likely to screen positive for depression/anxiety (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-3.86) and burnout (aOR 2.05, 95% CI 1.22-3.49) compared to attendings. The LCA analysis identified four subgroups of our respondents that differed in their responses to the work environment questions. These groups were identified as Work Environment Risk Group 1, an overall good work environment; Risk Group 2, inadequate resources; Risk Group 3, lack of perceived organizational support; and Risk Group 4, an overall poor work environment. Participants in the two groups who perceived their work conditions as most adverse were significantly more likely to screen positive for depression/anxiety (aOR 1.89, 95% CI 1.05-3.42; and aOR 2.04, 95% CI 1.14-3.66) compared to participants working in environments perceived as less adverse.
conclusionsWe found a strong association between a perceived adverse working environment and poor mental health, particularly when organizational support was deemed inadequate. Targeted strategies to promote better perceptions of the workplace are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.