Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35531426›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

Efficacy of oseltamivir in the treatment of patients infected with Covid-19.

Abolfazl Zendehdel, Mohammad Bidkhori, Mohsen Ansari, Saeidreza Jamalimoghaddamsiyahkali, Azadeh Asoodeh

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The effect of oseltamivir use in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A multicenter propensity score-matched study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Highly pathogenic coronaviruses and the kidney.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2022
    Review
  12. Lead/Drug Discovery from Natural Resources.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abolfazl ZendehdelGeriatrics Department, Associate Professor of Internal Medicine, Ziaeian Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad BidkhoriDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohsen AnsariRadiology Department, Amir al-Momenin Hospital, Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saeidreza JamalimoghaddamsiyahkaliDepartment of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, Ziaeian Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Azadeh AsoodehFamily Medicine Department, Ziaeian Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The recent unprecedented pandemic caused by Sars-Cov-2 (the new coronavirus 2019), is threatening public health around the world. Although several studies have been performed, there is no identified treatment for Covid-19 patients. Here we assessed the efficacy of oseltamivir in combination therapy, by comparing two different therapeutic regimens in hospitalized patients, in improving outcomes and find better treatment for Covid-19 patients. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of 285 confirmed Covid-19 in patients at (XXX). Depending on the date of admission, the patients were divided into two groups; group 1 (oseltamivir group) from February 20, 2020 to March 15, 2020 received Oseltamivir with routine regimen and group 2 (control group) from March 20, 2020 to April 20, 2020 received routine regimen alone that included Azithromycin 500 mg/day and Hydroxychloroquine 200 mg/12 h.Endpoints including duration of hospitalization, requirement to admission to intensive care unit (ICU) and mechanical ventilation, outcome and mortality rate. Results: A total of 285 patients were enrolled in the two months, 120 patients for group 1 and 165 for group 2. The median time from admission to discharge was significantly shorter in the oseltamivir group compared to the control group (4.9 vs 6.6 days, p < 0.001). Additionally, the mortality rate was found to be lower in the oseltamivir group than in the control group (1.7% vs 6,7%, p = 0.06) which was statistically significant by multivariate analysis (p = 0.03). The incidence of admission to the ICU (6.7% vs 11.5%, p = 0.1) and mechanical ventilation (2.5% vs 4.8%, p = 0.3) were also decreased in the oseltamivir group, but was not statistically significant. Conclusions: This study showed that administration of oseltamivir was associated with shorter length of hospital stay and earlier recovery and discharge of hospital, and a lower mortality rate.

Indexed as

AzithromycinCovid-19HydroxychloroquineOseltamivirSars-Cov-2

Identifiers

PMID35531426
PMCPMC9054703
OpenAlexW4225125074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.