Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35531251›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2022

Anti-biofilm potential of

Asmaa F Mekky, Wesam A Hassanein, Fifi M Reda, Hanan M Elsayed

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  10. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  11. Postbiotics Production of Candidate-ProbioticLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Synergistic Inhibitory Effect of Honey andPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Asmaa F MekkyDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Wesam A HassaneinDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Fifi M RedaDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Hanan M ElsayedDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Zagazig University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uropathogens develop biofilms on urinary catheters, resulting in persistent and chronic infections that are associated with resistance to antimicrobial therapy. Therefore, the current study was performed to control biofilm-associated urinary tract infections through assaying the anti-biofilm ability of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) against multidrug-resistant (MDR) uropathogens. Twenty LAB were obtained from pickles and fermented dairy products, and screened for their anti-biofilm and antimicrobial effects against MDR

Indexed as

AdherenceBHI, brain heart infusionBiofilmsCAUTI, catheter associated urinary tract infectionCFU, colony forming unitCRA, congo red agarCV, crystal violetLAB, Lactic acid bacteriaLactic acid bacteriaLPY3, Lactobacillus plantarum Y3MRS, De Man, Rogosa, and SharpePBS, phosphate-buffered salineSEM, scanning electron microscope

Identifiers

PMID35531251
PMCPMC9073023
OpenAlexW4205122778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.