Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35531230›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2022

Oluwole Solomon Oladeji, Abimbola Peter Oluyori, Adewumi Oluwasogo Dada

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oluwole Solomon OladejiIndustrial Chemistry Unit, Department of Physical Sciences, Landmark University, P.M.B. 1001, Omu-Aran, Nigeria.
Abimbola Peter OluyoriIndustrial Chemistry Unit, Department of Physical Sciences, Landmark University, P.M.B. 1001, Omu-Aran, Nigeria.
Adewumi Oluwasogo DadaIndustrial Chemistry Unit, Department of Physical Sciences, Landmark University, P.M.B. 1001, Omu-Aran, Nigeria.
Landmark University · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethnopharmacology relevance: Materials and methods: The antiplasmodial model, (or curative assay), was tested against Results and Discussion: Phytochemical analysis of the extracts revealed the presence of tannins, alkaloids, steroids, saponins, phenols, and alkaloids, among other metabolites. The highest quantities of total phenolic, total tannins, and total flavonoid content were found in 50% ethanolic extracts. There was significant decrease in the body weight of the mice after inoculation, however, after administration of crude extracts, an increase in weight was observed. A negative variation (-3.00 g) was observed in group without treatment. The ethanolic crude extracts (200 and 400 mg/kg) significantly increased the packed cell volume compared to other extracts. CQ treated experimental mice showed 100% inhibition with activity greater than extracts treated groups. The lowest inhibitory effect was observed in 200 mg/kg ethanolic bark extract treated group with activity of 72.16%. The antiplasmodial activities exhibited by these extracts could be linked to the chemical constituents investigated. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest the use of

Indexed as

AntimalarialAntiplasmodialCurative assayMalariaMorinda lucidaPlasmodium berghei NK65

Identifiers

PMID35531230
PMCPMC9073002
OpenAlexW4200078195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.