ArticleAdvances in neurodevelopmental disorders2022
Caregiver Satisfaction with Delivery of Telehealth Autism Services.
Article in Advances in neurodevelopmental disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Caregiver Perspectives on Priorities and Barriers in Applied Behavior Analysis Service Delivery for Autistic Individuals: A Community-Engaged Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- Hybrid Telehealth Adaptation of COMPASS for Hope: Parent-Mediated Outcomes in Autism.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess satisfaction with telehealth interventions for a large nonprofit organization that transitioned interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) to telehealth during a pandemic. Services provided via telehealth included applied behavior analysis (ABA), speech and language, and occupational therapies. A secondary survey evaluated reasons for declining telehealth services. Methods: A survey was administered to 10,567 families who were receiving autism interventions. A total of 440 respondents answered all the questions on the survey, and their results were included in this study. A secondary survey was administered to 223 individuals who declined to have telehealth autism interventions. Results: There was not a clinically meaningful difference in satisfaction across service types. Although all ratings were in the high range, caregivers ranked speech therapists as more dependable than ABA therapists, and this difference was statistically significant. The findings suggested that the majority of caregivers were generally satisfied with services provided in a telehealth format. For those who declined services, the majority indicated a discomfort with the use of technology. Conclusions: The participants of telehealth autism interventions reported high general satisfaction and indicated an improvement in their quality of life. Results provide suggestive evidence that increased satisfaction of telehealth services may allow for further acceptability and access for participants. Future research should evaluate participant and clinician satisfaction with telehealth versus in-person interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.