Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35531040›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2019

Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering scaffolds: a review.

Huawei Qu, Hongya Fu, Zhenyu Han, Yang Sun

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 260 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
260citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

260 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Multifunctional TPU-HAp/HA-TiOInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tantalum-Based Nanomaterials: From Properties to Biomedical Applications.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

200 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Huawei QuSchool of Mechatronics Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin 150001 China hongyafu@hit.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7125-5105
Hongya FuSchool of Mechatronics Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin 150001 China hongyafu@hit.edu.cn.
Zhenyu HanSchool of Mechatronics Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin 150001 China hongyafu@hit.edu.cn.
Yang SunSchool of Basic Medicine, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine Harbin 150030 China sunyang@hljucm.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone tissue engineering has been continuously developing since the concept of "tissue engineering" has been proposed. Biomaterials that are used as the basic material for the fabrication of scaffolds play a vital role in bone tissue engineering. This paper first introduces a strategy for literature search. Then, it describes the structure, mechanical properties and materials of natural bone and the strategies of bone tissue engineering. Particularly, it focuses on the current knowledge about biomaterials used in the fabrication of bone tissue engineering scaffolds, which includes the history, types, properties and applications of biomaterials. The effects of additives such as signaling molecules, stem cells, and functional materials on the performance of the scaffolds are also discussed.

Identifiers

PMID35531040
PMCPMC9070423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.