ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Ovarian protection and safety of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist after cervical cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phage therapy for treatment of bacterial vaginosis.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Molecular mechanisms underlying cyclophosphamide-induced ovarian injury and protective strategies.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Oncofertility and Fertility Preservation for Women with Gynecological Malignancies: Where Do We Stand Today?Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Review
- Reproductive and Obstetric Outcomes after Fertility-Sparing Treatments for Cervical Cancer: Current Approach and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This meta-analysis was performed using Stata (15.0), and sought to systematically evaluate the domestic application value of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GNRH-a) after cervical cancer, and explore its protective effect on the ovaries during chemotherapy. In many studies, the effectiveness and safety of GNRH-a are not consistent, and there is great controversy. Therefore, it is very important to systematically evaluate the protection and safety of GNRH-a after cervical cancer surgery. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched to retrieve articles on domestic trials examining the use of GNRH-a treatment in cervical cancer patients, published from January 2014 to January 2021, which were reviewed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study. The meta-analysis of the included study data was conducted using Stata 15.0. Results: In total, 10 articles were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 579 ovarian-reserved cervical cancer subjects, all of whom received 4-6 standardized courses of PC (Paclitaxel + Cisplatin) chemotherapy. The following statistically significant differences were found: bovine follicle stimulating hormone [odds ratio (OR) =1.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38-2.38; P<0.0001], bovine estrogen 2 (OR =2.39, 95% CI: 1.69-3.37; P<0.00001), anti-Mullerian hormone (OR =2.39, 95% CI: 1.71-3.34; P<0.00001), and bovine antral follicle count (OR =2.11, 95% CI: 1.49-2.99; P<0.0001); but there is no statistically significant difference incidence of coincidences (OR =0.80, 95% CI: 0.49-1.31; P=0.38). Conclusions: The use of GNRH-a in cervical cancer patients receiving the PC chemotherapy regimen plays a significant role in protecting ovarian function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.