ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Preemptive analgesia in the "non-tube no fasting" fast track program for resectable esophageal carcinoma.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgery is the main treatment for esophageal cancer, but postoperative incision pain seriously reduces patients' quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of preemptive analgesia of the upper abdomen with ropivacaine in the "non-tube no fasting" fast track recovery program for esophageal carcinoma. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) from February 2014 to August 2014. Patients in the study group underwent a conventional analgesia program together with local infiltration injection of ropivacaine in the upper abdominal incision 30 min before the operation, while patients in the control group underwent the conventional analgesia program alone. Ropivacaine was injected locally around the planned surgical incision, including intradermally, subcutaneously, in the fascial muscles, and in the parietal peritoneum layers. Li's anastomosis method was performed in the neck after MIE. No indwelling chest tube or abdominal cavity tube was placed in any patients. The use of analgesic pumps in the two groups of patients was recorded. Results: A total of 102 patients were enrolled in the study, with 52 patients in the study group and 50 patients in the control group. Patients in both groups completed the surgery successfully as planned, and the anesthesia methods and drugs used during the operation were the same. The surgical duration, blood loss, and the number of resected lymph nodes did not differ significantly between the two groups. Three patients in the study group and 10 patients in the control group used analgesia pumps (P=0.031). The visual analog scale (VAS) score at 30 days after surgery in the group with preemptive analgesia was significantly better than that in the control group (P=0.048). Conclusions: Preemptive analgesia for the upper abdomen with ropivacaine in the "non-tube no fasting" fast track recovery program for esophageal carcinoma is feasible and worthy of promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.