ArticleCureus2022
The Effect of Infection Precautions on Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Enterobacteriaceae Colonization Among Nurses in Three Beirut Hospitals.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) are rapidly emerging worldwide. This study aimed to assess the effect of contact precaution (CP) on ESBL-PE-colonization rates among nurses in three hospitals in Beirut, Lebanon, where ESBL is endemic, in order to define the risk factors for colonization. Accordingly, the ongoing use of CP to prevent ESBL-PE transmission to healthy nurses was evaluated. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in three hospitals. Hospital 1 required CP, Hospital 2 had recently stopped CP, and Hospital 3 had stopped it three years previously. Questionnaires and stool-collection containers were distributed to all patient care nurses in those three hospitals. The Returned samples were tested using the agar dilution technique. Results A total of 269 out of 733 nurses volunteered to participate; 140 met the inclusion criteria (no recent hospitalization, antibiotic use, or known ESBL-PE colonization) and provided samples. Among them, 15% were ESBL-positive. Compared to nurses from Hospital 3, nurses from Hospital 1 were 59% less likely to be colonized, while nurses from Hospital 2 were 62% more likely to be colonized. Conclusion In hospitals where CP is in place for ESBL-positive patients, ESBL-PE prevalence in nursing staff was significantly lower. Additionally, a work experience of two to four years increased the odds of ESBL-PE colonization in comparison with longer nursing experience. CP may be a justifiable means of protection against ESBL-PE transmission to healthy nurses. The risk factors for colonization were discontinuation of CP and a shorter clinical work experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.