Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35530827›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

A Comparative Study Between Vacuum Dressing and Normal Saline Dressing for Chronic Non-Healing Ulcers.

Pragadheeswaran M, Sankar Lingam P, Yuvaraj Balan, Anand K Pyati

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pragadheeswaran MGeneral Surgery, Mundiyampakkam Medical College and Hospital, Villupuram, Tamil Nadu, IND.
Sankar Lingam PGeneral Surgery, Chengalpattu Medical College and Hospital, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, IND.
Yuvaraj BalanBiochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, IND.
Anand K PyatiBiochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, IND.
Central Leprosy Teaching & Research Institute · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Isn't it a boon that all living organisms possess the ability to heal their injuries? The wound healing is faster when the normal physiology of the wound healing is maintained. Our understanding of wound healing has undergone dramatic changes in the recent past. Almost all materials and methods available on earth have been used and tested to facilitate the process of wound healing. The mental agony and the disability suffered by patients with chronic ulcers have led to the reappraisal of the basic components of the wound healing process and how they are influenced by biological, mechanical, and physical forces. The Department of General Surgery in our Government Chengalpattu Medical College and Hospital, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India, admits and treats a large volume of patients with wounds and ulcers. Here many materials are being used regularly for dressing to make wound healing faster. Vacuum dressings were also done on many patients, and promising results were observed. This kindled our interest in conducting this prospective study and comparing wound healing with vacuum dressing versus normal saline dressing. Materials and methods A total of 74 patients were included in the study, out of which 37 patients were randomly included in the experimental group and vacuum dressing was done, while the other 37 included in the control group were treated with dressing done with normal saline moistened gauze and bandage roll. Rates at which the wound healed were compared. Results We were able to observe a statistically significant difference in the rate of appearance of granulation tissue between the two and increased clearance of bacteria and toxins. The study group promised better progress as compared to the control group in various aspects. Conclusion Vacuum dressing brings an obvious improvement in the healing of non-healing ulcers and decreases the overall duration of stay in the hospital.

Indexed as

chronic wounddiabetic ulcerhealing ulcernegative pressure dressingnegative pressure therapynon-healing ulcernormal saline dressingsub-atmospheric pressure therapytopical negative pressure therapyvacuum dressing

Identifiers

PMID35530827
PMCPMC9074094
OpenAlexW4225987283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.