Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35530821›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positivity and Factors Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Gastric Cancer: An Umbrella Meta-Analysis.

Gashaw Hassen, Amita Kasar, Nidhi Jain, Shivankshi Berry, Jhanvi Dave, Michlene Zouetr, V Lakshmi N Priyanka Ganapathiraju, Tejaswini Kurapati, Stephanie Oshai, Mohamed Saad and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prognostic role and clinical significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Gashaw HassenProgressive Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, USA.
Amita KasarInternal Medicine, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Secunderabad, IND.
Nidhi JainMedicine and Surgery, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, IND.
Shivankshi BerryInternal Medicine, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, IND.
Jhanvi DaveInternal Medicine, B.J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND.
Michlene ZouetrFamily Medicine, American Institute of Antigua College of Medicine, St John's, ATG.
V Lakshmi N Priyanka GanapathirajuMedicine and Surgery, Rangaraya Medical College, Kakinada, IND.
Tejaswini KurapatiMedicine and Surgery, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, IND.
Stephanie OshaiMedicine and Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, NGA.
Mohamed SaadGastroenterology, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza, EGY.
Jahangirkhan PathanInternal Medicine, V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Crimea, RUS.
Sheetal KamatInternal Medicine, Apollo Hospital, Bangalore, IND.
Raghavendra TirupathiInternal Medicine, Keystone Health, Chambersburg, USA.
Urvish K PatelPublic Health and Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Rishabh K RanaPreventive and Social Medicine/Community Medicine, Shahid Nirmal Mahto Medical College, Dhanbad, Dhanbad, IND.
American University of Antigua · AGB.J. Medical College · INCancerCare · USDayanand Medical College & Hospital · INIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMercy Medical Center · USRangaraya Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies throughout the world with late diagnosis and poor prognosis. The expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in GC is attributed to immune evasion and tumor progression. PD-L1 positivity has both predictive and prognostic biomarker potential. Aiming to summarize a large amount of research and to provide a definitive conclusion to the conflicting results on the prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in GC, we performed an umbrella review based on existing meta-analyses which were published recently (2016-2021) and indexed in the PubMed database. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was used in August 2021 to screen articles, and data extraction with quality assessment was performed on the selected meta-analyses. Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 software was used to analyze the HR and OR with a 95% confidence interval (CI) among PD-L1 positive GC patients. We also assessed the between-study heterogeneity (

Indexed as

clinicopathologicalgastric cancerhazard ratiolymph node metastasismeta-analysisoverall survival (os)pd-l1poor prognosistumor stageumbrella review

Identifiers

PMID35530821
PMCPMC9076041
OpenAlexW4226226399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.