Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35530766›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2019

Optimization of metal-organic (citric acid) frameworks for controlled release of nutrients.

Ke Wu, Changwen Du, Fei Ma, Yazhen Shen, Jianmin Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Effect of HKUST-1 metal-organic framework in root and shoot systems, as well as seed germination.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ke WuThe State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences Nanjing 210008 China chwdu@issas.ac.cn +86-25-86881565.
Changwen DuThe State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences Nanjing 210008 China chwdu@issas.ac.cn +86-25-86881565.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9064-3581
Fei MaThe State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences Nanjing 210008 China chwdu@issas.ac.cn +86-25-86881565.
Yazhen ShenThe State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences Nanjing 210008 China chwdu@issas.ac.cn +86-25-86881565.
Jianmin ZhouThe State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences Nanjing 210008 China chwdu@issas.ac.cn +86-25-86881565.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although polymer-coated controlled-release fertilizers have been under development for decades, their high costs, complex production processes, and potential environmental hazards have limited their application. Therefore, it is necessary to design and develop new materials for controlled nutrient release. In this study, two novel MOFs, compounds I and II, were successfully fabricated and optimized using ferric chloride, phosphoric acid, citric acid, and urea under hydrothermal conditions. The N, P, and Fe contents in compound I were 9.05%, 14.92%, and 14.55%, respectively, while the corresponding values in compound II were 10.78%, 14.10%, and 16.68%. The soil incubation results revealed that both compounds showed good slow-release longevity (more than 100 days). This study provides a new strategy for the fabrication of novel controlled-release fertilizers.

Identifiers

PMID35530766
PMCPMC9072982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.