Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35530722›Full record

ArticleJournal of public economics2021

The Effect of Changes in Alcohol Tax Differentials on Alcohol Consumption.

Markus Gehrsitz, Henry Saffer, Michael Grossman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public economics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Markus GehrsitzUniversity of Strathclyde & IZA.
Henry SafferNBER.
Michael GrossmanNBER, CUNY Graduate Center & IZA.

Funding

Alcohol Taxes, Alcohol Prices and Alcohol Sales: Quasi-Natural ExperimentsR21AA025371 · NIAAA · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI SAFFER, HENRY · 2018 to 2019
$417k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA025371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We show that tax-induced increases in alcohol prices can lead to substantial substitution and avoidance behavior that limits reductions in alcohol consumption. Causal estimates are derived from a natural experiment in Illinois where spirits and wine taxes were raised sharply and unexpectedly in 2009. Beer taxes were increased by only a trivial amount. We construct representative and consistent measures of alcohol prices and sales from scanner data collected for hundreds of products in thousands of stores across the US. Using several difference-in-differences models, we show that alcohol excise taxes are instantly over-shifted. That is, a $1 tax increase translates into a price increase of up to $1.50. We find evidence suggesting that consumers react by switching to less expensive products. In particular, they increase purchases of beer, thus significantly moderating any tax-induced reductions in total ethanol consumption. Our study highlights the importance of tax-induced substitution, the implications of differential tax increases by beverage group and the impacts on public health of alternative types of tax hikes whose main aims are to increase revenue.

Identifiers

PMID35530722
PMCPMC9075414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.