Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35530511›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2022

Advances in Our Clinical Understanding of Autonomic Regulation Therapy Using Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Patients Living With Heart Failure.

Marvin A Konstam, Douglas L Mann, John James E Udelson, Jeffrey L Ardell, Gaetano M De Ferrari, Martin R Cowie, Helmut U Klein, Douglas D Gregory, Joseph M Massaro, Imad Libbus and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Hypertension: a missing piece in HFpEF?Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

Marvin A KonstamThe CardioVascular Center at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Douglas L MannCenter for Cardiovascular Research, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, United States.
John James E UdelsonThe CardioVascular Center at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Jeffrey L ArdellUCLA Neurocardiology Program of Excellence, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Gaetano M De FerrariCardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Martin R CowieSchool of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Helmut U KleinDivision of Cardiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.
Douglas D GregoryClinical Cardiovascular Science Foundation, Boston, MA, United States.
Joseph M MassaroDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.
Imad LibbusLivaNova USA Incorporated, Houston, TX, United States.
Lorenzo A DiCarloLivaNova USA Incorporated, Houston, TX, United States.
Javed ButlerDepartment of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States.
John D ParkerUniversity of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
John R TeerlinkSection of Cardiology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
LivaNova (United States) · USTufts Medical Center · USBoston University · USCardiovascular Clinical Science Foundation · USKing's College London · GBSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USUniversity of Turin · ITWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ANTHEM-HF, INOVATE-HF, and NECTAR-HF clinical studies of autonomic regulation therapy (ART) using vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) systems have collectively provided dose-ranging information enabling the development of several working hypotheses on how stimulation frequency can be utilized during VNS for tolerability and improving cardiovascular outcomes in patients living with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Changes in heart rate dynamics, comprising reduced heart rate (HR) and increased HR variability, are a biomarker of autonomic nerve system engagement and cardiac control, and appear to be sensitive to VNS that is delivered using a stimulation frequency that is similar to the natural operating frequency of the vagus nerve. Among prior studies, the ANTHEM-HF Pilot Study has provided the clearest evidence of autonomic engagement with VNS that was delivered using a stimulation frequency that was within the operating range of the vagus nerve. Achieving autonomic engagement was accompanied by improvement from baseline in six-minute walk duration (6MWD), health-related quality of life, and left ventricular EF (LVEF), over and above those achieved by concomitant guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) administered to counteract harmful neurohormonal activation, with relative freedom from deleterious effects. Autonomic engagement and positive directional changes have persisted over time, and an exploratory analysis suggests that improvement in autonomic tone, symptoms, and physical capacity may be independent of baseline NT-proBNP values. Based upon these encouraging observations, prospective, randomized controlled trials examining the effects on symptoms and cardiac function as well as natural history have been warranted. A multi-national, large-scale, randomized, controlled trial is well underway to determine the outcomes associated with ART using autonomic nervous system engagement as a guide for VNS delivery.

Indexed as

autonomic nervous systemautonomic regulation therapycardiomyopathyguideline directed medical therapy (GDMT)heart failureleft ventricular ejection fractionneuromodulationvagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35530511
PMCPMC9068946
OpenAlexW4285740706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.