ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2022
Clinical outcomes of extended intralesional curettage with cementation without implant augmentation in non-fracture giant cell tumor of bone around the knee.
Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- "A Giant Shoulder": Proximal Humerus Giant Cell Tumor Managed With Extended Curettage and Proximal Humerus Internal Locking System Plating with Fibular Strut Graft - A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Extended curettage versus en bloc resection for the treatment of grade 3 giant cell tumour of the knee with pathologic fracture: a retrospective study.International orthopaedics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There remains a lack of consensus regarding the necessity of implant augmentation or fixation after intralesional curettage in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) around the knee. This study assessed whether cementation alone is effective and safe in GCTB with a non-fracture around the knee. We retrospectively examined clinical data from 14 GCTB patients treated from 2012 to 2022. Outcome parameters were Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, postoperative fracture, metastases, recurrence and complications. Of the 14 GCTB cases examined, 10 were at the distal femur and four were at the proximal tibia. Mean patient age was 32 years, and follow-up time was 61 months. Mean tumor size was 61 × 79 × 50 mm, and MSTS score was 89.2%. There were no cases of postoperative fracture. Defect reconstruction with cementation alone may be strong enough to provide immediate stability and prevent postoperative fracture in GCTB around the knee.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.