Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35530312›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Intrinsic Differences in Spatiotemporal Organization and Stromal Cell Interactions Between Isogenic Lung Cancer Cells of Epithelial and Mesenchymal Phenotypes Revealed by High-Dimensional Single-Cell Analysis of Heterotypic 3D Spheroid Models.

Maria L Lotsberg, Gro V Røsland, Austin J Rayford, Sissel E Dyrstad, Camilla T Ekanger, Ning Lu, Kirstine Frantz, Linda E B Stuhr, Henrik J Ditzel, Jean Paul Thiery and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria L LotsbergCentre for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Gro V RøslandCentre for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Austin J RayfordCentre for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Sissel E DyrstadDepartment of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Camilla T EkangerDepartment of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Ning LuCentre for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Kirstine FrantzInstitute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Linda E B StuhrDepartment of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Henrik J DitzelInstitute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jean Paul ThieryCentre for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Lars A AkslenCentre for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
James B LorensCentre for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Agnete S T EngelsenCentre for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
University of Bergen · NOUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKBerGenBio (Norway) · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack of inadequate preclinical models remains a limitation for cancer drug development and is a primary contributor to anti-cancer drug failures in clinical trials. Heterotypic multicellular spheroids are three-dimensional (3D) spherical structures generated by self-assembly from aggregates of two or more cell types. Compared to traditional monolayer cell culture models, the organization of cells into a 3D tissue-like structure favors relevant physiological conditions with chemical and physical gradients as well as cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions that recapitulate many of the hallmarks of cancer

Indexed as

drug resistanceerlotinib-resistanceheterotypic 3D modelsimaging mass cytometryin vitro cell culture modelsnon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)tumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID35530312
PMCPMC9076321
OpenAlexW4224238579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.