Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35530295›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2022

DNA repair proteins as the targets for paroxetine to induce cytotoxicity in gastric cancer cell AGS.

Bang-Hung Liu, Tein-Ming Yuan, Chih-Jou Huang, Duan-Ting Hsu, Shi-Wen Chen, Nai-Wan Hsiao, Sheng-Chih Lin, Shu-Wan Wu, Yi-Mei J Lin, Show-Mei Chuang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Targetable pathways for drug repurposing in gastric cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Repurposed Drugs in Gastric Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bang-Hung LiuInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Hsing University Taichung 402, Taiwan.
Tein-Ming YuanDepartment of Surgery, Feng Yuan Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare Taichung 420, Taiwan.
Chih-Jou HuangInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Hsing University Taichung 402, Taiwan.
Duan-Ting HsuInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Hsing University Taichung 402, Taiwan.
Shi-Wen ChenDepartment of Surgery, Feng Yuan Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare Taichung 420, Taiwan.
Nai-Wan HsiaoDepartment of Biology, National Changhua University of Education Changhua 500, Taiwan.
Sheng-Chih LinInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Hsing University Taichung 402, Taiwan.
Shu-Wan WuInstitute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica Taipei 115, Taiwan.
Yi-Mei J LinInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Hsing University Taichung 402, Taiwan.
Show-Mei ChuangInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Hsing University Taichung 402, Taiwan.
National Chung Hsing University · TWMinistry of Health and Welfare · KRNational Changhua University of Education · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the potential anticancer effects of 1175 FDA-approved drugs, cell viability screening was performed using 25 human cancer cell lines covering 14 human cancer types. Here, we focus on the action of paroxetine, which demonstrated greater toxicity toward human gastric adenocarcinoma cell-line AGS cells compared with the other FDA-approved drugs, exhibiting an IC50 value lower than 10 μM. Evaluation of the underlying novel mechanisms revealed that paroxetine can enhance DNA damage in gastric cancer cells and involves downregulation of Rad51, HR23B and ERCC1 expression and function, as well as nucleotide shortage. Enhancement of autophagy counteracted paroxetine-induced apoptosis but did not affect paroxetine-induced DNA damage. Paroxetine also enhanced ROS generation in AGS cells, but a ROS scavenger did not improve paroxetine-mediated DNA damage, apoptosis, or autophagy, suggesting ROS might play a minor role in paroxetine-induced cell toxicity. In contrast, paroxetine did not enhance DNA damage, apoptosis, or autophagy in another insensitive gastric adenocarcinoma cell-line MKN-45 cells. Interestingly, co-administration of paroxetine with conventional anticancer agents sensitized MKN-45 cells to these agents: co-treated cells showed increased apoptosis relative to MKN-45 cells treated with the anticancer agent alone. Unequivocally, these data suggest that for the first time that paroxetine triggers cytotoxicity and DNA damage in AGS cells at least partly by reducing the gene expression of Rad51, HR23B, and ERCC1. Our findings also suggest that paroxetine is a promising candidate anticancer agent and/or chemosensitizing agent for use in combination with other anticancer drugs in cancer therapy. The molecular mechanisms underlying the anticancer activity of co-treatment with paroxetine and chemotherapy appear to be complex and are worthy of further investigation.

Indexed as

apoptosischemosensitizerDNA damagedrug repurposingGastric cancerparoxetine

Identifiers

PMID35530295
PMCPMC9077064
OpenAlexW4285742652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.