Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35530187›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2022

Hyperfractionated-Accelerated Reirradiation with Proton Therapy for Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma.

Wen Shen Looi, Julie A Bradley, Xiaoying Liang, Christiana M Shaw, Mark Leyngold, Raymond B Mailhot Vega, Eric D Brooks, Michael S Rutenberg, Lisa R Spiguel, Fantine Giap and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wen Shen LooiUniversity of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Julie A BradleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Xiaoying LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Christiana M ShawDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Mark LeyngoldDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Raymond B Mailhot VegaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Eric D BrooksDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Michael S RutenbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Lisa R SpiguelDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Fantine GiapDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Nancy P MendenhallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Florida College · USUniversity of Florida · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) is a rare complication among patients treated with radiation therapy for breast cancer. Hyperfractionated-accelerated reirradiation (HART) improves local control after surgery. Proton therapy may further improve the therapeutic ratio by mitigating potential toxicity. Materials and Methods: Six patients enrolled in a prospective registry with localized RAAS received HART with proton therapy between 2015 and 2021. HART was delivered twice or thrice daily in fraction sizes of 1.5 or 1.0 Gy, respectively. All patients received 45 Gy to a large elective volume followed by boosts to a median dose of 65 (range, 60-75) Gy. Toxicity was recorded prospectively by using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Results: The median follow-up duration was 1.5 (range, 0.25-2.9) years. The median age at RAAS diagnosis was 73 (range, 60-83) years with a median latency of 8.9 (range, 5-14) years between radiation therapy completion and RAAS diagnosis. The median mean heart dose was 2.2 (range, 0.1-4.96) Gy. HART was delivered postoperatively (n = 1), preoperatively (n = 3), preoperatively for local recurrence after initial management with mastectomy (n = 1), and as definitive treatment (n = 1). All patients had local control of disease throughout follow-up. Three of 4 patients treated preoperatively had a pathologic complete response. The patient treated definitively had a complete metabolic response on her posttreatment PET/CT (positron emission tomography-computed tomography) scan. Two patients developed distant metastatic disease despite local control and died of their disease. Acute grade 3 toxicity occurred in 3 patients: 2 patients undergoing preoperative HART experienced wound dehiscence and 1 postoperatively developed grade 3 wound infection, which resolved. Conclusion: HART with proton therapy appears effective for local control of RAAS with a high rate of pathologic complete response and no local recurrences to date. However, vigilant surveillance for distant metastasis should occur. Toxicity is comparable to that in photon/electron series. Proton therapy for RAAS may maximize normal tissue sparing in this large-volume reirradiation setting.

Indexed as

angiosarcomabreast cancercancer outcomeshyperfractionated radiationsecond malignancies

Identifiers

PMID35530187
PMCPMC9009453
OpenAlexW4205161282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.