Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35530186›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2022

Radiation-Induced Toxicity Risks in Photon Versus Proton Therapy for Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer.

Line Bjerregaard Stick, Maria Fuglsang Jensen, Søren M Bentzen, Claus Kamby, Anni Young Lundgaard, Maja Vestmø Maraldo, Birgitte Vrou Offersen, Jen Yu, Ivan Richter Vogelius

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Chronic radiation-induced dermatitis: what is new in 2024? A narrative review.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. ACR-ARS Practice Parameter for the Performance of Proton Beam Therapy.International journal of particle therapy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Line Bjerregaard StickDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maria Fuglsang JensenDanish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Søren M BentzenGreenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Epidemiology and Public, Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Claus KambyDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anni Young LundgaardDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maja Vestmø MaraldoDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Birgitte Vrou OffersenDanish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jen YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
Ivan Richter VogeliusDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rigshospitalet · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKBaptist Health South Florida · USU-M Rogel Cancer Center

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study compares photon and proton therapy plans for patients with synchronous bilateral early breast cancer and estimates risks of early and late radiation-induced toxicities. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four patients with synchronous bilateral early breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiation therapy using photons, 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy, were included and competing pencil beam scanning proton therapy plans were created. Risks of dermatitis, pneumonitis, acute esophageal toxicity, lung and breast fibrosis, hypothyroidism, secondary lung and esophageal cancer and coronary artery events were estimated using published dose-response relationships and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. Results: The primary clinical target volume V95% and/or nodal clinical target volume V90% were less than 95% in 17 photon therapy plans and none of the proton plans. Median NTCP of radiation dermatitis ≥ grade 2 was 18.3% (range, 5.4-41.7) with photon therapy and 58.4% (range, 31.4-69.7) with proton therapy. Median excess absolute risk (EAR) of secondary lung cancer at age 80 for current and former smokers was 4.8% (range, 0.0-17.0) using photons and 2.7% (range, 0.0-13.6) using protons. Median EAR of coronary event at age 80, assuming all patients have preexisting cardiac risk factors, was 1.0% (range, 0.0-5.6) with photons and 0.2% (range, 0.0-1.3) with protons. Conclusion: Proton therapy plans improved target coverage and reduced risk of coronary artery event and secondary lung cancer while increasing the risk of radiation dermatitis.

Indexed as

bilateral breast cancerbioeffect modelingnormal tissue complication probabilityproton therapytreatment planning

Identifiers

PMID35530186
PMCPMC9009461
OpenAlexW3217178692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.