Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35530121›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law2021

Measuring stalking: the development and evaluation of the Stalking Assessment Indices (SAI).

Troy E McEwan, Melanie Simmons, Taryn Clothier, Svenja Senkans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antisocial personality traits as potential risk factors for cyberstalking: only aspects of psychopathy and narcissism matter.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Troy E McEwanCentre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology and Forensicare, Alphington, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6935-8420
Melanie SimmonsCentre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology and Forensicare, Alphington, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4065-2938
Taryn ClothierCentre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology and Forensicare, Alphington, VIC, Australia.
Svenja SenkansCentre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology and Forensicare, Alphington, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0483-9922

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate measurement of stalking has proven difficult, partly because stalking is characterised by the cumulative effects of a pattern of behaviour. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a new measure of stalking that overcomes the observed shortcomings of existing tools. The Stalking Assessment Indices (SAI) were created using index development principles and evaluated in 244 Australian undergraduate students (

Indexed as

harassmentindex developmentintimate partner abusemeasurementobsessive relational intrusionstalkingunwanted pursuit behaviour

Identifiers

PMID35530121
PMCPMC9067960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.