Removal of refractory organics in dinitrodiazophenol industrial wastewater by an ultraviolet-coupled Fenton process.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Integrated biological and UV-Fenton processes for the treatment of automobile service station wastewater.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2025
   Article
2. Enhancement of photo-Fenton catalytic activity with the assistance of oxalic acid on the kaolin-FeOOH system for the degradation of organic dyes.RSC advances · 2020
   Article
3. The efficient degradation of organic pollutants in an aqueous environment under visible light irradiation by persulfate catalytically activated with kaolin-FeRSC advances · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract