SynthesisPlant communications2022
Implications of carbon catabolite repression for plant-microbe interactions.
Synthesis in Plant communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcriptomics-based analysis to explore the effects of culture media and cell models on the function of B. pseudocatenulatum strains of intestinal origin.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Article
- MtfA, a C2H2 transcriptional regulator, negatively regulates PRPS2-mediated biosynthesis of the adenosine analogue acadesine inMycology · 2026Article
- Real-time simultaneous monitoring of multiple analytes in bacterial cultures.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Genomic and Transcriptomic Insights into Carbon-Source and Temporal Induction of a Diverse Set of Lignocellulolytic Enzymes inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Carbon source utilization regulates biofilm formation and plant-beneficial interactions ofiScience · 2025Article
- Article
- A multilayered regulatory network mediated by protein phosphatase 4 controls carbon catabolite repression and de-repression in Magnaporthe oryzae.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Synthetic communities as a model for determining interactions between a biofertilizer chassis organism and native microbial consortia.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Current models in bacterial hemicellulase-encoding gene regulation.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Genomic Characterization and Establishment of a Genetic Manipulation System forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A novel luciferase-based reporter tool to monitor the dynamics of carbon catabolite repression in filamentous fungi.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Article
- Glucose Catabolite Repression Participates in the Regulation of Sialidase Biosynthesis by Antarctic StrainJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Rapid dissemination of host metabolism-manipulating genes via integrative and conjugative elements.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Effects ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Xylose and shikimate transporters facilitates microbial consortium as a chassis for benzylisoquinoline alkaloid production.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Tetracarboxylic acid transporter regulates growth, conidiation, and carbon utilization in Metarhizium acridum.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- The importance of understanding the regulation of bacterial metabolism.Environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Regulation of hierarchical carbon substrate utilization, nitrogen fixation, and root colonization by the Hfq/Crc/CrcZY genes iniScience · 2022Article
- Genetic Circuit Design in Rhizobacteria.Biodesign research · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carbon catabolite repression (CCR) plays a key role in many physiological and adaptive responses in a broad range of microorganisms that are commonly associated with eukaryotic hosts. When a mixture of different carbon sources is available, CCR, a global regulatory mechanism, inhibits the expression and activity of cellular processes associated with utilization of secondary carbon sources in the presence of the preferred carbon source. CCR is known to be executed by completely different mechanisms in different bacteria, yeast, and fungi. In addition to regulating catabolic genes, CCR also appears to play a key role in the expression of genes involved in plant-microbe interactions. Here, we present a detailed overview of CCR mechanisms in various bacteria. We highlight the role of CCR in beneficial as well as deleterious plant-microbe interactions based on the available literature. In addition, we explore the global distribution of known regulatory mechanisms within bacterial genomes retrieved from public repositories and within metatranscriptomes obtained from different plant rhizospheres. By integrating the available literature and performing targeted meta-analyses, we argue that CCR-regulated substrate use preferences of microorganisms should be considered an important trait involved in prevailing plant-microbe interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.