Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35529929›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

Benefits of Equine-Assisted Therapies in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review.

Ana Myriam Lavín-Pérez, Daniel Collado-Mateo, Alejandro Caña-Pino, Santos Villafaina, Jose Alberto Parraca, María Dolores Apolo-Arenas

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Bibliometric Analysis on Equine-Assisted Interventions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Myriam Lavín-PérezCentre for Sport Studies, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28943 Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9357-9987
Daniel Collado-MateoCentre for Sport Studies, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28943 Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5140-465X
Alejandro Caña-PinoDepartment of Medical Surgical-Therapy, Medicine Faculty, Extremadura University, 06006 Badajoz, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5341-9791
Santos VillafainaFaculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Avenida de la Universidad s/n, Cáceres 10003, Extremadura, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0784-1753
Jose Alberto ParracaDepartamento de Desporto e Saúde, Escola de Saude e Desenvolvimento Humano, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5254-7409
María Dolores Apolo-ArenasDepartment of Medical Surgical-Therapy, Medicine Faculty, Extremadura University, 06006 Badajoz, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8347-7589
Universidad de Extremadura · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ESUniversity of Évora · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to provide an up-to-date analysis of the effects of equine-assisted therapies (EAT) in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to conduct this systematic review. PubMed and Web of Science databases were employed in the search, which ended in February 2022. The risk of bias analysis was performed using the Evidence Project tool. After removing duplicates, thirty-nine studies were identified. However, only ten fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Therefore, a total of 195 PwMS, aged between 40.3 and 51.3, were included in this systematic review. EAT-based interventions had a mean length of 13.6 weeks with a session´s frequency ranging from ten to once a week. All sessions involved real horses and lasted a mean of 34.4 min. Among the included articles, four were randomized controlled trials (RCT), four did not perform randomization, and two employed a prepost design without a control group. RCTs showed positive effects on quality of life, fatigue, balance, spasticity, and gait speed. Furthermore, non-RCT showed improvements in balance, spasticity, and postural control (postural control was not assessed in RCT studies). Importantly, significant effects were only observed when the comparison group was inactive or followed usual care. Therefore, EAT is a promising and effective therapy to improve quality of life, fatigue, balance, spasticity, and gait speed in PwMS. However, since comparison groups are heterogeneous, results could vary depending on the research design. Moreover, the inclusion of noncontrolled studies (in order to have a wide perspective of the state of art) could increase the risk of bias and make the results be taken with caution.

Identifiers

PMID35529929
PMCPMC9068279
OpenAlexW4224987122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.