Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35529804›Full record

ArticleBeilstein journal of nanotechnology2022

Effect of sample treatment on the elastic modulus of locust cuticle obtained by nanoindentation.

Chuchu Li, Stanislav N Gorb, Hamed Rajabi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Beilstein journal of nanotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The puncture mechanics: an example from the bed bugJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chuchu LiFunctional Morphology and Biomechanics, Institute of Zoology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5524-828X
Stanislav N GorbFunctional Morphology and Biomechanics, Institute of Zoology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9712-7953
Hamed RajabiDivision of Mechanical Engineering and Design, School of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1792-3325
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DELondon South Bank University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cuticle is one of the most abundant, but least studied, biological composites. As a result, it has contributed very little to the field of biomimetics. An important step to overcome this problem is to study cuticle biomechanics by means of accurate mechanical measurements. However, due to many reasons, mechanical testing on fresh cuticle specimens is not always possible. Hence, researchers often use stored specimens to measure properties of arthropod cuticle. Our knowledge about the influence of different treatment methods on cuticle properties is currently very limited. In this study, we investigated the effect of freezing, desiccation, and rehydration on the elastic modulus of the hind tibial cuticle of locusts obtained by nanoindentation. We found that all the mentioned treatments significantly influence cuticle properties. This is in contrast to previous reports suggesting that freezing did not significantly influence the elastic modulus of native cuticle specimens tested in bending. In the light of our data, we suggest that changes of the elastic modulus of cuticle are not solely due to changes of the water content. Our results provide a platform for more accurate measurements of cuticle properties.

Indexed as

biomimeticscuticlelocustmaterial propertiesmechanical testingnanoindentationwater content

Identifiers

PMID35529804
PMCPMC9039525
OpenAlexW4224302606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.