Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35529699›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Comparison of the levels of neopterin, CRP, and IL-6 in patients infected with and without SARS-CoV-2.

Satoshi Hara, Tama Sanatani, Natsuo Tachikawa, Yukihiro Yoshimura, Nobuyuki Miyata, Hiroaki Sasaki, Risa Kuroda, Chinatsu Kamikokuryo, Tomohiro Eguchi, Shuhei Niiyama and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Detection of autoantibodies in severe COVID-19 patients two years after hospital discharge.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Satoshi HaraSchool of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.
Tama SanataniSchool of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.
Natsuo TachikawaDivision of Infectious Disease, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yukihiro YoshimuraDivision of Infectious Disease, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Nobuyuki MiyataDivision of Infectious Disease, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroaki SasakiDivision of Infectious Disease, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Risa KurodaAsano Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Chinatsu KamikokuryoDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, Japan.
Tomohiro EguchiDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, Japan.
Shuhei NiiyamaDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, Japan.
Yasuyuki KakihanaDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, Japan.
Hiroshi IchinoseSchool of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.
Kagoshima University · JPYokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital · JPTokyo Institute of Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neopterin (NP) is a biomarker for activated cellular immunity and is elevated in diseases including viral and bacterial infections, autoimmune diseases, and cancer. However, the clinical assessment of neopterin has not been used for these disorders because the physiological significance of measuring NP is obscure. It would be important to compare the NP profiles with those of other inflammation markers especially in relatively early phase of patients to reveal the significance of NP measurements in pathological states. Methods: Plasma NP, biopterin, CRP, and IL-6 levels were measured in 46 patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and 23 patients with non-COVID-19 disorders. The correlations between these markers were analyzed in the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients independently. Results: The NP levels were significantly higher in the COVID-19 patients than in the non-COVID-19 patients, while biopterin, CRP and IL-6 were not changed significantly. The NP levels were found to show a weak negative correlation against the days after onset in the COVID-19 patients ( Conclusions: The elevation of NP levels was supposed to be distinct from those of CRP and IL-6 in relatively early and mild COVID-19 patients. Our data suggest that NP is produced at the early phase of infection by different signaling pathways and/or cells from those of CRP and IL-6. Further study on the signaling pathway to induce NP is expected.

Indexed as

BiomarkerCOVID-19CRPIL-6NeopterinSARS-CoV-2Viral infection

Identifiers

PMID35529699
PMCPMC9066961
OpenAlexW4225390882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.