Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35529694›Full record

ArticleGerontology & geriatric medicine

Who's in the House? Staffing in Long-Term Care Homes Before and During COVID-19 Pandemic.

Shirin Vellani, Franziska Zuniga, Karen Spilsbury, Annica Backman, Nancy Kusmaul, Kezia Scales, Charlene H Chu, José Tomás Mateos, Jing Wang, Anette Fagertun and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gerontology & geriatric medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. BMC digital health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Shirin VellaniFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6032-0266
Franziska ZunigaNursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8844-4903
Karen SpilsburyFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Annica BackmanDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Nancy KusmaulSchool of Social Work, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2278-8495
Kezia ScalesParaprofessional Healthcare Institute, Bronx, NY, USA.
Charlene H ChuLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
José Tomás MateosDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain.
Jing WangFudan University School of Nursing, Shanghai, China.
Anette FagertunCentre for Care Research West, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Katherine S McGiltonLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2470-9738
Fudan University · CNHealth Sciences Centre · CAMontefiore Health System · USUmeå University · SEUniversitat de Lleida · ESUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County · USUniversity of Toronto · CAWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical gaps exist in our knowledge on how best to provide quality person-centered care to long-term care (LTC) home residents which is closely tied to not knowing what the ideal staff is complement in the home. A survey was created on staffing in LTC homes before and during the COVID-19 pandemic to determine how the staff complement changed. Perspectives were garnered from researchers, clinicians, and policy experts in eight countries and the data provides a first approximation of staffing before and during the pandemic. Five broad categories of staff working in LTC homes were as follows: (1) those responsible for personal and support care, (2) nursing care, (3) medical care, (4) rehabilitation and recreational care, and (5) others. There is limited availability of data related to measuring staff complement in the home and those with similar roles had different titles making it difficult to compare between countries. Nevertheless, the survey results highlight that some categories of staff were either absent or deemed non-essential during the pandemic. We require standardized high-quality workforce data to design better decision-making tools for staffing and planning, which are in line with the complex care needs of the residents and prevent precarious work conditions for staff.

Indexed as

common data elementsCOVID-19long-term care homesstaff complementworkforce

Identifiers

PMID35529694
PMCPMC9073116
OpenAlexW4225390865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.