Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35529671›Full record

ReviewEthology, ecology & evolution2022

A socio-ecological perspective on the gestural communication of great ape species, individuals, and social units.

Kirsty E Graham, Gal Badihi, Alexandra Safryghin, Charlotte Grund, Catherine Hobaiter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ethology, ecology & evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Individual variation in animal communication: from species averages to unique voices.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Overcoming bias in the comparison of human language and animal communication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Are ape gestures like words? Outstanding issues in detecting similarities and differences between human language and ape gesture.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kirsty E GrahamSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Mary's Quad, South St, St Andrews KY16 9JP, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7422-7676
Gal BadihiSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Mary's Quad, South St, St Andrews KY16 9JP, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5025-906X
Alexandra SafryghinSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Mary's Quad, South St, St Andrews KY16 9JP, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8019-5455
Charlotte GrundSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Mary's Quad, South St, St Andrews KY16 9JP, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8993-5176
Catherine HobaiterSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Mary's Quad, South St, St Andrews KY16 9JP, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3893-0524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last 30 years, most research on non-human primate gestural communication has been produced by psychologists, which has shaped the questions asked and the methods used. These researchers have drawn on concepts from philosophy, linguistics, anthropology, and ethology, but despite these broad influences the field has neglected to situate gestures into the socio-ecological context in which the diverse species, individuals, and social-units exist. In this review, we present current knowledge about great ape gestural communication in terms of repertoires, meanings, and development. We fold this into a conversation about variation in other types of ape social behaviour to identify areas for future research on variation in gestural communication. Given the large variation in socio-ecological factors across species and social-units (and the individuals within these groups), we may expect to find different preferences for specific gesture types; different needs for communicating specific meanings; and different rates of encountering specific contexts. New tools, such as machine-learning based automated movement tracking, may allow us to uncover potential variation in the speed and form of gesture actions or parts of gesture actions. New multi-group multi-generational datasets provide the opportunity to apply analyses, such as Bayesian modelling, which allows us to examine these rich behavioural landscapes. Together, by expanding our questions and our methods, researchers may finally be able to study great ape gestures from the perspective of the apes themselves and explore what this gestural communication system reveals about apes' thinking and experience of their world.

Indexed as

ethologygestureGorillaPanPongoprimate

Identifiers

PMID35529671
PMCPMC9067943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.