Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35529488›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

The response of geophytes to continuous human foraging on the Cape south coast, South Africa and its implications for early hunter-gatherer mobility patterns.

M Susan Botha, Richard M Cowling, Jan C De Vynck, Karen J Esler, Alastair J Potts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M Susan BothaBotany Department, African Centre for Coastal Palaeoscience, Gqeberha, Eastern Cape, South Africa.
Richard M CowlingBotany Department, African Centre for Coastal Palaeoscience, Gqeberha, Eastern Cape, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3514-2685
Jan C De VynckBotany Department, African Centre for Coastal Palaeoscience, Gqeberha, Eastern Cape, South Africa.
Karen J EslerStellenbosch University, Conservation Ecology & Entomology, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6510-727X
Alastair J PottsBotany Department, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha, Eastern Cape, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0919-7279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current ecological understanding of plants with underground storage organs (USOs) suggests they have, in general, low rates of recruitment and thus as a resource it should be rapidly exhausted, which likely had implications for hunter-gatherer mobility patterns. We focus on the resilience (defined here as the ability of species to persist after being harvested) of USOs to human foraging. Human foragers harvested all visible USO material from 19 plots spread across six Cape south coast (South Africa) vegetation types for three consecutive years (2015-2017) during the period of peak USO apparency (September-October). We expected the plots to be depleted after the first year of harvesting since the entire storage organ of the USO is removed during foraging,

Indexed as

PlantsAfrica, EasternAustraliaHumansSouth AfricaBet-hedgingGeophyte ecologyHarvestingHunter-gatherer mobility patternsUnderground storage organs

Identifiers

PMID35529488
PMCPMC9074880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.