Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35529467›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2022

Function Over Mass: A Meta-Analysis on the Importance of Skeletal Muscle Quality in COVID-19 Patients.

Flaydson Clayton Silva Pinto, Márcia Fábia Andrade, Guilherme Henrique Gatti da Silva, Jaline Zandonato Faiad, Ana Paula Noronha Barrére, Renata de Castro Gonçalves, Gabriela Salim de Castro, Marília Seelaender

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Editorial: Systemic markers of muscle loss.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023
    Article
  16. [Coronavirus disease 2019 and frailty].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Flaydson Clayton Silva PintoCancer Metabolism Research Group, Department of Surgery, LIM26 HC-USP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Márcia Fábia AndradeCancer Metabolism Research Group, Department of Surgery, LIM26 HC-USP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Guilherme Henrique Gatti da SilvaCancer Metabolism Research Group, Department of Surgery, LIM26 HC-USP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jaline Zandonato FaiadCancer Metabolism Research Group, Department of Surgery, LIM26 HC-USP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Paula Noronha BarréreCancer Metabolism Research Group, Department of Surgery, LIM26 HC-USP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renata de Castro GonçalvesCancer Metabolism Research Group, Department of Surgery, LIM26 HC-USP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gabriela Salim de CastroCancer Metabolism Research Group, Department of Surgery, LIM26 HC-USP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marília SeelaenderCancer Metabolism Research Group, Department of Surgery, LIM26 HC-USP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRBrandeis University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection is a highly contagious disease affecting both the higher and lower portions of the respiratory tract. This disease reached over 265 million people and has been responsible for over 5.25 million deaths worldwide. Skeletal muscle quality and total mass seem to be predictive of COVID-19 outcome. This systematic review aimed at providing a critical analysis of the studies published so far reporting on skeletal muscle mass in patients with COVID-19, with the intent of examining the eventual association between muscle status and disease severity. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate whether skeletal muscle quantity, quality and function were related to disease severity. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were conducted according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and reported according to the guidelines of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guide. From a total of 1,056 references found, 480 were selected after removing duplicates. Finally, only 7 met the specified inclusion criteria. The results of this meta-analysis showed that skeletal muscle quality, rather than quantity, was associated with COVID-19 severity, as confirmed by lower skeletal muscle density and lower handgrip strength in patients with severe disease. Muscle function assessment can thus be a valuable tool with prognostic value in COVID-19.

Indexed as

coronavirusCOVID-19disease outcomemuscle densitysarcopeniaSARS-CoV-2skeletal muscleskeletal muscle index

Identifiers

PMID35529467
PMCPMC9067541
OpenAlexW4224241100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.