Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35529346›Full record

ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2022

Automated segmentation of the larynx on computed tomography images: a review.

Divya Rao, Prakashini K, Rohit Singh, Vijayananda J

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Exploring the Impact of Model Complexity on Laryngeal Cancer Detection.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring Radiomics for Classification of Supraglottic Tumors: A Pilot Study in a Tertiary Care Center.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Divya Rao *Department of Information and Communication Technology, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, 576104 Manipal, India.
Prakashini K *Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, 576104 Manipal, India.
Rohit SinghDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, 576104 Manipal, India.
Vijayananda J *Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, 560045 Philips, Bangalore, India.
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · INCentre for Artificial Intelligence and Robotics · INKasturba Medical College, Manipal · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The larynx, or the voice-box, is a common site of occurrence of Head and Neck cancers. Yet, automated segmentation of the larynx has been receiving very little attention. Segmentation of organs is an essential step in cancer treatment-planning. Computed Tomography scans are routinely used to assess the extent of tumor spread in the Head and Neck as they are fast to acquire and tolerant to some movement. This paper reviews various automated detection and segmentation methods used for the larynx on Computed Tomography images. Image registration and deep learning approaches to segmenting the laryngeal anatomy are compared, highlighting their strengths and shortcomings. A list of available annotated laryngeal computed tomography datasets is compiled for encouraging further research. Commercial software currently available for larynx contouring are briefed in our work. We conclude that the lack of standardisation on larynx boundaries and the complexity of the relatively small structure makes automated segmentation of the larynx on computed tomography images a challenge. Reliable computer aided intervention in the contouring and segmentation process will help clinicians easily verify their findings and look for oversight in diagnosis. This review is useful for research that works with artificial intelligence in Head and Neck cancer, specifically that deals with the segmentation of laryngeal anatomy. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-022-00221-3.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputed TomographyComputer-Aided DetectionLarynx SegmentationMedical Image Processing

Identifiers

PMID35529346
PMCPMC9046475
OpenAlexW4220966590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.