Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35529314›Full record

ReviewBioinorganic chemistry and applications2022

Rohit Sharma, Prashant Bedarkar, Deepak Timalsina, Anand Chaudhary, Pradeep Kumar Prajapati

RetractedAbstract readReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Review in Bioinorganic chemistry and applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Retracted:Bioinorganic chemistry and applications · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Emerging Role of Neuron-Glia in Neurological Disorders: At a Glance.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The Structural and Thermal properties of Badarashma Pishti.Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Retraction · 2023-12-20Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/36E66BA4E89EDA6B514BCA73FEED8B
  • Retracted
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rohit SharmaDepartment of Rasashastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana, Faculty of Ayurveda, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3682-3573
Prashant BedarkarDepartment of Rasashastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana, Institute of Teaching and Research in Ayurveda, Gujarat Ayurved University, Jamnagar 361008, India.
Deepak TimalsinaCentral Department of Chemistry, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu 44618, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2124-8809
Anand ChaudharyDepartment of Rasashastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana, Faculty of Ayurveda, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Pradeep Kumar PrajapatiDepartment of Rasashastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana, All India Institute of Ayurveda, New Delhi 110076, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5816-1673

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scholars of ancient Ayurveda (Indian system of medicine) were extremely reasonable and had strong scientific rationality in fundamental concepts, which are also applied to drug manufacture and therapy.

Identifiers

PMID35529314
PMCPMC9076343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.