ArticleCureus2022
Nutritional Risk Screening in Hospitalized Adults Using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool at a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives Malnutrition is still widely prevalent in India. Various nutritional screening tools have been developed to screen for nutritional risk status but no one tool is considered the best. The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) is accepted by the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism and validated for use in hospitalized adults. Hence, it was used in this study to estimate the prevalence of malnutrition in hospitalized adults and its association with socioeconomic inequality. Methods A sample of randomly selected 358 ambulatory hospitalized patients above 18 years of age was used in the study. Data pertaining to demography, socioeconomic status, medical history, and MUST were collected using a structured questionnaire. The height and weight of the patients were measured, and their BMI was determined. The patients were classified into five socioeconomic classes and their MUST scores were determined. Results Statistically significant (P < 0.05) increasing trend was observed in the height, weight, and BMI of patients with increasing socioeconomic status. Diabetes mellitus (39%) followed by hypertension (30%) were the predominant comorbid conditions. According to MUST, the overall prevalence of medium and high risk of malnutrition was 11% and 24%, respectively, and the socioeconomic class that was most impacted was Class 4 (1,130-2,259 INR per capita monthly income). Interpretation and conclusions Socioeconomic status influences the prevalence of malnutrition, comorbid conditions, and the anthropometric measurements of admitted patients. The prevalence of nutritional risk status irrespective of sex was found to be 34.91% (24.3% in males and 10.61% in women) in the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.