ReviewComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
A Clinical Analysis and Literature Review of Six Cases with Primary Pulmonary Lymphoepithelioma-Like Carcinoma.
Review in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: A Clinical Analysis and Literature Review of Six Cases with Primary Pulmonary Lymphoepithelioma-Like Carcinoma.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023Article
- Pathogenesis and therapeutic implications of EBV-associated epithelial cancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-12Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methods: The clinical data of six patients with primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma treated in Zhejiang Taizhou Hospital of Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group) from May 2014 to December 2018 were summarized and analyzed. Combined with the relevant literature, the primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma was analyzed retrospectively. Results: The main manifestations of six patients were respiratory symptoms, and cough was the most common. The imaging features of six patients were mainly round-like high-density mass shadow or nodule shadow. All patients were diagnosed by pathology. Microscopically, the cancer cells were nested, with large nuclei and vacuoles and abundant lymphocyte infiltration in the tumor stroma. The positive rates of EBER, p63, CK5/6, and Ki-67 were high, and TTF-1 was negative. Five patients received surgical treatment. One patient developed brain metastasis 12 months after operation and received craniocerebral radiotherapy. The other patients did not receive radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and one patient did not receive treatment. After follow-up, four patients survived so far, the longest survival time was 82 months, one patient lost follow-up, and one patient died of lung metastasis 24 months after operation. Conclusion: Primary pulmonary lymphoepitheliomatoid-like carcinoma is a rare lung malignant tumor, whose pathogenesis is related to Epstein-Barr virus infection. The clinical manifestations are nonspecific, but with unique pathological characteristics. Surgical resection is the proper treatment for early-stage patients, and comprehensive treatment with surgery as the main treatment is suitable for late-stage patients. The prognosis is good.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.