ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2022
Prognostic Factors for Visual Outcomes in Closed Idiopathic Macular Holes after Vitrectomy: Outcomes at 4 Years in a Monocentric Study.
Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Value of Preoperative Anatomical and Functional Parameters for Long-Term Visual Outcomes After Full-Thickness Macular Hole Surgery with the Inverted Flap Technique.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Macular hole surgery in times of the COVID-19 pandemic.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Choroidal hypertransmission width on optical coherence tomography: a prognostic biomarker in idiopathic macular hole surgery.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
- Non-Invasive Retinal Imaging Modalities for the Identification of Prognostic Factors in Vitreoretinal Surgery for Full-Thickness Macular Holes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To identify predictive factors of visual outcomes in the eyes after successful macular hole (MH) surgery. Methods: It is a retrospective monocentric study of the eyes that underwent successful vitrectomy for full-thickness MH in an academic, tertiary care center (CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada) between 2014 and 2018. We included a single eye per patient and excluded the eyes with ocular comorbidities. Clinical and anatomical features of patients were collected, including demographics, MH duration, baseline MH size, baseline visual acuity (VA), and final VA. Multiple logistic regressions were performed to determine predictive factors of VA ≥70 ETDRS letters (Snellen equivalent: 20/40) and VA gain ≥15 ETDRS letters at final follow-up. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to determine the performance of each model and identify the Youden index maximizing performance at a given threshold. Results: A total of 460 eyes were included in this study; 274/460 eyes (60%) achieved final VA ≥70 ETDRS letters and 304/460 eyes (66%) had a VA gain ≥15 ETDRS letters at 24 months follow-up. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that the main predictive factors for final VA ≥70 ETDRS letters (model AUC = 0.716) were baseline VA (OR = 1.064; Conclusion: The eyes with shorter MH duration, smaller MH size, and higher preoperative VA achieved better visual outcomes after successful MH surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.