Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35529010›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2022

Nuclear cardiology for a cardiothoracic surgeon.

Anand Kumar Mishra, Harpreet Singh, Vidur Bansal, Javid Raja, Ashwani Sood

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anand Kumar MishraDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012 India.
Harpreet SinghDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Vidur BansalDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012 India.ORCID 0000-0001-9635-0977
Javid RajaDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012 India.
Ashwani SoodDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac surgeons are commonly faced with issues regarding the balance between the potential risk and the potential benefit of a surgical procedure. Nuclear cardiology procedures such as single-photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography provide the surgeon with objective information that augments standard clinical and angiographic assessments related to the diagnosis, prognosis, and potential benefit from any intervention. Myocardial perfusion is imaged with the use of radiopharmaceuticals that accumulate rapidly in the myocardium in proportion to the myocardial blood flow. Radionuclide lung imaging most commonly involves the demonstration of pulmonary perfusion using technetium-99 m macro aggregate albumin (Tc-99 m MAA), as well as the assessment of ventilation using inspired inert gas, usually xenon, or Tc-99 m-labelled aerosols. Nuclear cardiology is extensively used as a part of the work-up of ischemic heart disease and cardiac failure in deciding the optimal therapeutic strategy with its ability to predict the severity of the disease. It has also proved extremely useful in the management of congenital heart disease and the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, among many other applications. Myocardial perfusion imaging is a basic adjunct to the noninvasive assessment of patients with stable angina, baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities, post-revascularisation assessment, and heart failure. This review article covers a summary of basic concepts of nuclear cardiology about what a cardiac surgeon should be aware of. To many, it is just a perfusion test, but the versatility, reliability, and future of the technology are without a doubt.

Indexed as

Myocardial perfusionMyocardial viabilityViability

Identifiers

PMID35529010
PMCPMC9023643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.