ArticleProceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences2022
Classifying Cyber-Risky Clinical Notes by Employing Natural Language Processing.
Article in Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving Clinical Documentation with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.Perspectives in health information management · 2024Pooled it
- Unperceivable Designs of Wearable Electronics.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical notes, which can be embedded into electronic medical records, document patient care delivery and summarize interactions between healthcare providers and patients. These clinical notes directly inform patient care and can also indirectly inform research and quality/safety metrics, among other indirect metrics. Recently, some states within the United States of America require patients to have open access to their clinical notes to improve the exchange of patient information for patient care. Thus, developing methods to assess the cyber risks of clinical notes before sharing and exchanging data is critical. While existing natural language processing techniques are geared to de-identify clinical notes, to the best of our knowledge, few have focused on classifying sensitive-information risk, which is a fundamental step toward developing effective, widespread protection of patient health information. To bridge this gap, this research investigates methods for identifying security/privacy risks within clinical notes. The classification either can be used upstream to identify areas within notes that likely contain sensitive information or downstream to improve the identification of clinical notes that have not been entirely de-identified. We develop several models using unigram and word2vec features with different classifiers to categorize sentence risk. Experiments on i2b2 de-identification dataset show that the SVM classifier using word2vec features obtained a maximum F1-score of 0.792. Future research involves articulation and differentiation of risk in terms of different global regulatory requirements.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.