ArticleFrontiers in neuroanatomy2022
Single-Neuron Labeling in Fixed Tissue and Targeted Volume Electron Microscopy.
Article in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human cerebral organoids: cellular composition and subcellular morphological features.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The structural complexity of nervous tissue makes it very difficult to unravel the connectivity between neural elements at different scales. Numerous methods are available to trace long-range projections at the light microscopic level, and to identify the actual synaptic connections at the electron microscopic level. However, correlating mesoscopic and nanoscopic scales in the same cell, cell population or brain region is a problematic, laborious and technically demanding task. Here we present an effective method for the 3D reconstruction of labeled subcellular structures at the ultrastructural level, after single-neuron labeling in fixed tissue. The brain is fixed by intracardial perfusion of aldehydes and thick vibratome sections (250 μm) are obtained. Single cells in these vibratome sections are intracellularly injected with horseradish peroxidase (HRP), so that the cell body and its processes can be identified. The thick sections are later flat-embedded in epoxy resin and re-sectioned into a series of thinner (7 μm) sections. The sections containing the regions of interest of the labeled cells are then imaged with automated focused ion beam milling and scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM), acquiring long series of high-resolution images that can be reconstructed, visualized, and analyzed in 3D. With this methodology, we can accurately select any cellular segment at the light microscopic level (e.g., proximal, intermediate or distal dendrites, collateral branches, axonal segments, etc.) and analyze its synaptic connections at the electron microscopic level, along with other ultrastructural features. Thus, this method not only facilitates the mapping of the synaptic connectivity of single-labeled neurons, but also the analysis of the surrounding neuropil. Since the labeled processes can be located at different layers or subregions, this method can also be used to obtain data on the differences in local synaptic organization that may exist at different portions of the labeled neurons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.