Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35528857›Full record

ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2022

Prescribing patterns of antidiabetics in type 2 diabetes and factors affecting them.

Moayad Allyhiani, Ahmad Kurdi, Akrm Abdulaziz, Sultan Faqeh, Abdulrahman Alhajjaji, Safwan Alansari, Abdulrhman Althaqafi, Naweed Alzaman, Majid Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Moayad AllyhianiCollege of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad KurdiCollege of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Akrm AbdulazizCollege of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Sultan FaqehCollege of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman AlhajjajiCollege of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Safwan AlansariCollege of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrhman AlthaqafiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care, Al Noor Specialist Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Naweed AlzamanCollege of Medicine, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Araba.
Majid AliSchool of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire (hosted by Global Academic Foundation), New Administrative Capital, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: There are limited studies that address the use of newer antidiabetics by prescribers in Saudi Arabia and their adoption of the newer diabetes guidelines. The primary aim of our study was to explore the prescribing patterns of first- and second-line agents for the management of type 2 diabetes and the factors affecting them. Methods: A cross-sectional self-administered survey was designed to collect responses from the prescribers in the Makkah Region of Saudi Arabia from 16 February through 16 June 2021. The questionnaire was developed in the English language, piloted, and tested for validity. Participants were recruited on a convenience sampling basis, and the data were collected by visiting them in-person. Results: A total of 103 prescribers responded to the survey. The majority of the respondents were male (69%), Saudi nationals (54%), practicing in Makkah city (62%), working in the government sector (62%), and had the prescribing experience of 1-5 years (37%). Metformin (95%) was the respondents' most preferred first-line drug of choice, followed by sulfonylureas (5%). When the first-line was contraindicated, sulfonylureas (30%) were considered the most preferred drug of choice, followed by DPP4 inhibitors (25%) and SGLT2 inhibitors (16%), respectively. When the first-line was not sufficient to control diabetes, sulfonylureas (32%) and DPP4 inhibitors (31%) were considered the most preferred drugs of choice as an add-on therapy. SGLT2 inhibitors (31%) and metformin (24%) were considered the preferred first-line choices if the patient had an established cardiovascular disease. Conclusion: Sulfonylureas were found to be the most considered choice as second-line therapy. There is a need to provide targeted education to the prescribers related to the newer diabetes guidelines in order to promote the use of more evidence-based and safer antidiabetics.

Indexed as

Factors affecting prescribingGuidelines adoptionGuidelines awarenessPrescribing patternType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID35528857
PMCPMC9072689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.