ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2022
Knowledge of opioid-induced respiratory depression among Chinese health care professionals: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purposes of this study were to measure knowledge about opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) among Chinese health care professionals and explore the associated factors that influence Chinese health care professionals' knowledge. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted. A convenience sample of 900 Chinese health care professionals from 21 provinces, four municipalities, and four autonomous regions was used. The OIRD knowledge questionnaire, which is a self-designed questionnaire based on evidence, was used to judge the degree of knowledge among Chinese health care professionals according to the accuracy rate. The questionnaire included questions on six dimensions of knowledge. Sociodemographic characteristics were also measured by a multi-item questionnaire. Results: The overall accuracy rate on the OIRD knowledge questionnaire for all participants were 64.5% ±10.0% (mean ± SD) with a range from 20% to 100%. According to univariate analysis, Chinese health care professionals' OIRD knowledge was positively correlated with age, region, profession, hospital level, type of hospitals and departments, education level, years of clinical working, and clinical practice of chronic cancer pain (CP) management. Multiple linear regression analysis showed differences in professions and regions (all Conclusions: Most Chinese health care professionals had misconceptions about OIRD and lacked relevant knowledge. We should assign importance to developing targeted training programs and exploring feasible and effective training methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.