Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35528787›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2022

Real-world Early Outcomes and Retreatment Rates Following Water Vapour Ablative Therapy for Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Danielle Whiting, Mohamed Noureldin, Yehia Abdelmotagly, Maximilian J Johnston, James Brittain, Govindaraj Rajkumar, Amr Emara, Richard Hindley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Real-world comparison of RezūmWorld journal of urology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Danielle WhitingDepartment of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.
Mohamed NoureldinDepartment of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.
Yehia AbdelmotaglyDepartment of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.
Maximilian J JohnstonDepartment of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.
James BrittainDepartment of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.
Govindaraj RajkumarDepartment of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.
Amr EmaraDepartment of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.
Richard HindleyDepartment of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.
Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital · GBAin Shams University · EGUniversity of Winchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rezūm water vapour ablation is an effective minimally invasive surgical therapy for the treatment of bladder outflow obstruction. Objective: To present early outcomes and reoperation rates after Rezūm, including an analysis of retreatment rates to gain an insight into optimal patient selection and the durability of the procedure. Design setting and participants: Data were prospectively collected for consecutive patients undergoing Rezūm for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia between March 2017 and January 2020 at two hospital sites. Intervention: Rezūm treatment of the prostate. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Patients were reviewed at 6 wk and 3, 6, and 12 mo after their Rezūm procedure. We evaluated changes in urinary symptoms and the retreatment rate. Results and limitations: A total of 461 patients undergoing Rezūm were analysed. The mean (±standard deviation) follow-up duration was 16.7 ± 10.4 mo. The mean patient age was 67.5 ± 7.8 yr and the mean prostate volume was 56.5 ± 24.0 ml. There was a significant improvement in mean maximum flow rate and postvoid residual volume and in International Prostate Symptom Score and quality-of-life scores ( Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the beneficial effects of Rezūm observed in the pivotal phase 2 randomised study are transferable to a real-world population with a comparable early retreatment rate. A range of procedures were used for retreatment. The factors dictating which option to select were based on patient concerns regarding side effects, gland volume, symptom profile, and cystoscopy findings. Patient summary: We investigated outcomes for patients undergoing Rezūm, a water vapour treatment to reduce the size of the prostate in men with obstruction of the bladder outlet because of benign prostate enlargement. This technique yields significant improvements in symptoms and preserves sexual function. The proportion of men needing retreatment was 2.4% in the first year after their Rezūm procedure.

Indexed as

Benign prostatic hyperplasiaLower urinary tract symptomsMinimally invasive therapyReoperationRezūmWater vapour therapy

Identifiers

PMID35528787
PMCPMC9068731
OpenAlexW4226474530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.