ArticleEuropean urology open science2022
Real-world Early Outcomes and Retreatment Rates Following Water Vapour Ablative Therapy for Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
Article in European urology open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reintervention rates after minimally invasive benign prostatic hyperplasia therapies: a systematic review including industry involvement.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- Thulium laser incision of prostate with selective median lobe vaporesection versus water vapor thermal therapy in the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction with ejaculation-sparing intent: a retrospective, comparative analysis from two institutions.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Real-world comparison of RezūmWorld journal of urology · 2026Article
- State-of-the-art in minimally invasive treatments for benign prostatic obstruction.Investigative and clinical urology · 2026Review
- Do patients Rezum medications?-a real-world analysis of medical retreatment after water vapor thermal therapy.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Introduction of a Structured Reporting Protocol and Surgical Checklist for Rezum Water Vapor Therapy (VAPOR-SRP).Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Waiting for HoLEP-outcomes when complications arise in the preoperative period.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- To Rezūm or Not to Rezūm: A Narrative Review of Water Vapor Thermal Therapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Minimally invasive surgical techniques (MISTs) for benign prostatic hyperplasia: results from a Delphi consensus project to shed light on controversial topics.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing Rezūm with transurethral needle ablation and microwave thermotherapy for the management of enlarged prostate.BJUI compass · 2024Review
- Minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS): promise or panacea?Asian journal of andrology · 2024Review
- Prospective Trial of Water Vapor Thermal Therapy for Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Subjects with a Large Prostate: 6- and 12-month Outcomes.European urology open science · 2023Article
- Composite urinary and sexual outcomes after Rezum: an analysis of predictive factors from an Italian multi-centric study.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rezūm water vapour ablation is an effective minimally invasive surgical therapy for the treatment of bladder outflow obstruction. Objective: To present early outcomes and reoperation rates after Rezūm, including an analysis of retreatment rates to gain an insight into optimal patient selection and the durability of the procedure. Design setting and participants: Data were prospectively collected for consecutive patients undergoing Rezūm for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia between March 2017 and January 2020 at two hospital sites. Intervention: Rezūm treatment of the prostate. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Patients were reviewed at 6 wk and 3, 6, and 12 mo after their Rezūm procedure. We evaluated changes in urinary symptoms and the retreatment rate. Results and limitations: A total of 461 patients undergoing Rezūm were analysed. The mean (±standard deviation) follow-up duration was 16.7 ± 10.4 mo. The mean patient age was 67.5 ± 7.8 yr and the mean prostate volume was 56.5 ± 24.0 ml. There was a significant improvement in mean maximum flow rate and postvoid residual volume and in International Prostate Symptom Score and quality-of-life scores ( Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the beneficial effects of Rezūm observed in the pivotal phase 2 randomised study are transferable to a real-world population with a comparable early retreatment rate. A range of procedures were used for retreatment. The factors dictating which option to select were based on patient concerns regarding side effects, gland volume, symptom profile, and cystoscopy findings. Patient summary: We investigated outcomes for patients undergoing Rezūm, a water vapour treatment to reduce the size of the prostate in men with obstruction of the bladder outlet because of benign prostate enlargement. This technique yields significant improvements in symptoms and preserves sexual function. The proportion of men needing retreatment was 2.4% in the first year after their Rezūm procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.