Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35528781›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2022

Safety and Feasibility of Soractelite Transperineal Focal Laser Ablation for Prostate Cancer and Short-term Quality of Life Analysis from a Multicenter Pilot Study.

Luigi A M J G van Riel, Rob A A van Kollenburg, André N Vis, Pim J van Leeuwen, Theo M de Reijke, Daniel M de Bruin, Jorg R Oddens

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05584787 naunknown statusnot on this map

Transperineal Laser Ablation for Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: a Single Cohort Analysis

TypeinterventionalSponsorSan Carlo di Nancy HospitalRan2021 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsProstate CancerArmsSoractelite Echolaser Transperineal focal laser ablation
NCT06794333 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Efficacy of Trans-Perineal Laser Ablation Vs Water Vapor Ablation for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: a Single Center Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PisaRan2024 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaArmsTransperineal laser Ablation, Rezum Vapor Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luigi A M J G van RielUrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres: Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rob A A van KollenburgUrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres: Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
André N VisUrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres: Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Pim J van LeeuwenNetherlands Cancer Institute: Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Nederlands Kanker Instituut, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Theo M de ReijkeUrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres: Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Daniel M de BruinUrology and Biomedical Engineering & Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Centres: Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jorg R OddensUrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres: Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Soractelite™ transperineal focal laser ablation (TPLA) for the treatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa) using the Echolaser® system is a novel minimally invasive technique that has the potential to induce tissue ablation, while reducing treatment-related morbidity, when compared with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and radiotherapy. Objective: To determine the short-term safety and feasibility of single or multifiber TPLA, its functional outcomes, and quality of life (QoL). Design setting and participants: TPLA was performed in 12 patients, consecutively assigned to four treatment regimens, with localized PCa who were scheduled for RARP ("ablate and resect design"). The treatment regimens were as follows: (1) a single fiber at 3 W, (2) two fibers at 5 mm distance at 3 W, (3) two fibers at 10 mm distance at 3 W, and (4) a single fiber at 5 W. TPLA was scheduled 4 wk prior to RARP. Intervention: TPLA using the Echolaser® system under local anesthesia at the outpatient clinic. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Safety and feasibility were determined by the assessment of device-related peri- and postoperative adverse events (AEs), and length of hospital stay. Functional outcomes and QoL were measured using validated questionnaires. Feasibility of RARP was assessed by a questionnaire for the urologist. Results and limitations: Patients were dismissed after a median (interquartile range) hospital admission of 3.25 (1.25) h. No device-related AEs occurred. AEs that occurred were mostly related to lower urinary tract symptoms and were mild (grade 1-2). Most AEs resolved within 1 wk. A QoL analysis showed no significant differences for all treatment regimens. Functional outcomes remained unchanged, except for erectile function after 1 wk, which returned to baseline after 4 wk. TPLA treatment did not compromise RARP, based on the questionnaires. Conclusions: TPLA for the treatment of PCa at the outpatient clinic appears to be safe and feasible with good short-term QoL and functional outcomes; oncological results are awaited. Patient summary: Focal treatment of localized prostate cancer can safely be performed in a daycare setting using a new technique, based on laser ablation, without compromising quality of life.

Indexed as

Focal therapyLaser ablationMinimally invasive therapyProstatic neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID35528781
PMCPMC9068724
OpenAlexW4226266498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.