ArticleCurrent medical mycology2021
Molecular identification of
Article in Current medical mycology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neonatal Candida infections in Brazil: study on virulence and antifungal susceptibility with predominance of non-albicans Candida.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Observational
- Symptomatic candiduria in neonates, infants, and pediatric patients admitted to ICUs: epidemiology, risk factors, clinical symptoms, and outcomes of empirical antifungal therapy.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Molecular Identification and Evaluation of Resistance to Antifungal Drugs inHealth science reports · 2026Article
- Microbiological Relevance ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP): Potential Point-of-Care Testing for Vulvovaginal Candidiasis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- High prevalence of fluconazole resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: The present study was performed to raise attention on the frequency of Materials and Methods: In total, 60 urine samples were collected from the suspected neonates and children. Identification of Results: The restriction fragment length polymorphism fingerprint analysis revealed that Conclusion: Candiduria has always been a challenging issue, especially in children admitted to hospitals. Outcome of candiduria in patients with generally healthy is little.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.