ArticleRSC advances2019
Reduced graphene oxide/CoS
Article in RSC advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Progress in the Preparation of Transition Metal Sulfide Materials and Their Supercapacitor Performance.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Solution-processed graphene oxide electrode for supercapacitors fabricated using low temperature thermal reduction.RSC advances · 2020Article
- A 2D metal-organic framework/reduced graphene oxide heterostructure for supercapacitor application.RSC advances · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Graphene/transition metal hybrid electrode materials are considered promising electrode materials for supercapacitor applications. However, the stacking of graphene sheets and agglomeration of transition metal parts are still challenging issues to overcome in order to achieve the expected theoretical performances. Herein, a reduced graphene oxide/cobalt disulphide porous nanoparticle hybrid electrode material is fabricated using sulphur as the template precursor. The unique porosity derived from the sulphur template gives favourable open structures for easy diffusion of electrolyte ions and better accessible active sites, and free space for volume changes and results in improved electrochemical performance. In this hybrid material the graphene layers serve as a conductive matrix and physical support for pours cobalt sulphide nanoparticles. On the other hand, the porous cobalt sulphide redox-active material uniformly decorated on rGO can enhance the pseudocapacitive performance of the as synthesized hybrid material. Using the combined advantage of graphene and transition metal sulphide the as synthesized composite electrode material has excellent specific capacitance, excellent rate capability and cycling stability. Thus, our design approach can be considered as a potential candidate to design advanced energy storage devices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.