ArticleRSC advances2019
Efficient release of immunocaptured cells using coiled-coils in a microfluidic device.
Article in RSC advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microfluidic isolation and release of live disseminated breast tumor cells in bone marrow.PloS one · 2025Article
- Past, Present, and Future of Affinity-based Cell Separation Technologies.Acta biomaterialia · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Label-free and affinity-based cell separation allows highly specific cell capture through simple procedures, but it remains a major challenge to efficiently release the captured cells without changing their structure, phenotype, and function. We report a microfluidic platform for label-free immunocapture of target cells and efficient release of the cells with minimal biochemical and biophysical perturbations. The method capitalizes on self-assembly of a pair of heterodimerizing coiled-coils, A and B. Target cells are captured in microchannels functionalized with an antibody and A and efficiently released by a liquid flow containing B-PEG (a conjugate of B and polyethylene glycol) at a controlled, low shear stress. The released cells have no antibodies attached or endogenous surface molecules cleaved. In a model system, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were isolated from a mixture of HUVECs and human ovarian carcinoma cells. The capture selectivity, capture capacity, and release efficiency were 96.3% ± 1.8%, 10 735 ± 1897 cells per cm
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.