ArticleJournal of oncology2022
Clinical Efficacy of Interventional Chemotherapy Embolization Combined with Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation on Patients with Liver Cancer.
Article in Journal of oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic significance of Glypican-3 in hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Retracted: Clinical Efficacy of Interventional Chemotherapy Embolization Combined with Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation on Patients with Liver Cancer.Journal of oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-08-02Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/F53B23E5DCD9C8143A39E0D13C1FEC
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the greater prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection, liver tumor is especially popular in China. In China, it is the 4th most prevalent tumor and the 3rd main reason for cancer fatalities. Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) account for more than 91% of every liver tumor case, and chemotherapy and immunotherapy are the better therapy choices. It is a serious threat to the lives and health of Chinese citizens. Patients diagnosed with liver tumors have a bad prognosis. Surgical resection, liver transplantation, chemotherapeutic embolization, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are all choices for patients who are detected early. More effective therapies can result in a better prognosis. This paper analyzes the clinical efficiency of interventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) integrated with monopolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) on patients with a liver tumor. Initially, the dataset is collected and the patients are treated with combined TACE and RFA. The computed tomography (CT) images are obtained using three-phase CT imaging. The images are segmented using adaptive U-Net-based segmentation. The clinical efficiency of the patients is evaluated using Robust Residual Convolutional Neural Network (RR-CNN) which is optimized using Firefly Particle Swarm Optimization (FPSO) algorithm. The performance of the system is analyzed using the MATLAB simulation tool. In performance analysis, the proposed method of RR-CNN is high when compared to the existing method of CNN, logistic regression using genetic algorithm and KNN in overall parameters are accuracy, sensitivity,
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.