Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35528144›Full record

ArticlePattern recognition2022

Super U-Net: a modularized generalizable architecture.

Cameron Beeche, Jatin P Singh, Joseph K Leader, Sinem Gezer, Amechi P Oruwari, Kunal K Dansingani, Jay Chhablani, Jiantao Pu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pattern recognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cameron BeecheDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Jatin P SinghDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Joseph K LeaderDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Sinem GezerDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Amechi P OruwariDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Kunal K DansinganiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Jay ChhablaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Jiantao PuDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Jessie Nedrow · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
Macro-vasculature: A Novel Image Biomarker of Lung CancerR01CA237277 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PU, JIANTAO · 2020 to 2024
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCI NIH HHS R01 CA237277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a novel convolutional neural network (CNN) termed "Super U-Net" for medical image segmentation. Methods: Super U-Net integrates a dynamic receptive field module and a fusion upsampling module into the classical U-Net architecture. The model was developed and tested to segment retinal vessels, gastrointestinal (GI) polyps, skin lesions on several image types (i.e., fundus images, endoscopic images, dermoscopic images). We also trained and tested the traditional U-Net architecture, seven U-Net variants, and two non-U-Net segmentation architectures. K-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate performance. The performance metrics included Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and sensitivity. Results: Super U-Net achieved average DSCs of 0.808±0.0210, 0.752±0.019, 0.804±0.239, and 0.877±0.135 for segmenting retinal vessels, pediatric retinal vessels, GI polyps, and skin lesions, respectively. The Super U-net consistently outperformed U-Net, seven U-Net variants, and two non-U-Net segmentation architectures (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Dynamic receptive fields and fusion upsampling can significantly improve image segmentation performance.

Indexed as

dynamic receptive fieldfusion upsamplingimage segmentationU-Net

Identifiers

PMID35528144
PMCPMC9070860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.