Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35528029›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2022

Optocapacitance: physical basis and its application.

Bernardo I Pinto, Carlos A Z Bassetto, Francisco Bezanilla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Tapered fiber probe-based optical cardiac pacemaker.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. High-Precision Photoacoustic Neural Modulation Uses a Non-Thermal Mechanism.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  9. A silicon diode-based optoelectronic interface for bidirectional neural modulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Biophysical reviews · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bernardo I PintoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.
Carlos A Z BassettoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.
Francisco BezanillaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.

Funding

The Electrophysiological Studies of Voltage Gated ChannelsR01GM030376 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BEZANILLA, FRANCISCO J · 1985 to 2025
$9.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The observation that membrane capacitance increases with temperature has led to the development of new methods of neuronal stimulation using light. The optocapacitive effect refers to a light-induced change in capacitance produced by the heating of the membrane through a photothermal effect. This change in capacitance manifests as a current, named optocapacitive current that depolarizes cells and therefore can be used to stimulate excitable tissues. Here, we discuss how optocapacitance arises from basic membrane properties, the characteristics of the optocapacitive current, its use for neuronal stimulation, and the challenges for its application in vivo.

Indexed as

Membrane capacitanceNanoparticlesOptocapacitanceRemote neuronal stimulationTemperature

Identifiers

PMID35528029
PMCPMC9042976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.