ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pore size estimation in axon-mimicking microfibers with diffusion-relaxation MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Single-subject electroencephalography measurement of interhemispheric transfer time for the in-vivo estimation of axonal morphology.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We present a novel approach that allows the estimation of morphological features of axonal fibers from data acquired Theory: The proposed approach is based on a biophysical model of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data and of axonal conduction velocity estimates obtained with Electroencephalography (EEG). In a white matter tract of interest, these data depend on (1) the distribution of axonal radius [ Methods: MRI and EEG data were recorded from 14 healthy volunteers. MRI data were collected with a 3T scanner. MRI-measured g-ratio maps were computed and sampled along the visual transcallosal tract. EEG data were recorded using a 128-lead system with a visual Poffenberg paradigm. The interhemispheric transfer time and axonal conduction velocity were computed from the EEG current density at the group level. Using the MRI and EEG measures and the proposed model, we estimated morphological properties of axons in the visual transcallosal tract. Results: The estimated interhemispheric transfer time was 11.72 ± 2.87 ms, leading to an average conduction velocity across subjects of 13.22 ± 1.18 m/s. Out of the 4 free parameters of the proposed model, we estimated θ - the width of the right tail of the axonal radius distribution - and β - the scaling factor of the axonal g-ratio, a measure of fiber myelination. Across subjects, the parameter θ was 0.40 ± 0.07 μm and the parameter β was 0.67 ± 0.02 μm Conclusion: The estimates of axonal radius and myelination are consistent with histological findings, illustrating the feasibility of this approach. The proposed method allows the measurement of the distribution of axonal radius and myelination within a white matter tract, opening new avenues for the combined study of brain structure and function, and for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.