Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35527816›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Rita Oliveira, Andria Pelentritou, Giulia Di Domenicantonio, Marzia De Lucia, Antoine Lutti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rita OliveiraLaboratory for Research in Neuroimaging, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Andria PelentritouLaboratory for Research in Neuroimaging, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Giulia Di DomenicantonioLaboratory for Research in Neuroimaging, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marzia De LuciaLaboratory for Research in Neuroimaging, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Antoine LuttiLaboratory for Research in Neuroimaging, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We present a novel approach that allows the estimation of morphological features of axonal fibers from data acquired Theory: The proposed approach is based on a biophysical model of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data and of axonal conduction velocity estimates obtained with Electroencephalography (EEG). In a white matter tract of interest, these data depend on (1) the distribution of axonal radius [ Methods: MRI and EEG data were recorded from 14 healthy volunteers. MRI data were collected with a 3T scanner. MRI-measured g-ratio maps were computed and sampled along the visual transcallosal tract. EEG data were recorded using a 128-lead system with a visual Poffenberg paradigm. The interhemispheric transfer time and axonal conduction velocity were computed from the EEG current density at the group level. Using the MRI and EEG measures and the proposed model, we estimated morphological properties of axons in the visual transcallosal tract. Results: The estimated interhemispheric transfer time was 11.72 ± 2.87 ms, leading to an average conduction velocity across subjects of 13.22 ± 1.18 m/s. Out of the 4 free parameters of the proposed model, we estimated θ - the width of the right tail of the axonal radius distribution - and β - the scaling factor of the axonal g-ratio, a measure of fiber myelination. Across subjects, the parameter θ was 0.40 ± 0.07 μm and the parameter β was 0.67 ± 0.02 μm Conclusion: The estimates of axonal radius and myelination are consistent with histological findings, illustrating the feasibility of this approach. The proposed method allows the measurement of the distribution of axonal radius and myelination within a white matter tract, opening new avenues for the combined study of brain structure and function, and for

Indexed as

axonal morphologyEEGIHTTin vivo histologyMRI

Identifiers

PMID35527816
PMCPMC9070985
OpenAlexW4224247348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.