Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35527791›Full record

ArticleBrain, behavior, & immunity - health2022

Brain and behavior in health communication: The Canadian COVID-19 Experiences Project.

Peter A Hall, Geoffrey T Fong, Sara C Hitchman, Anne C K Quah, Thomas Agar, Gang Meng, Hasan Ayaz, Bruce P Dore, Mohammad N Sakib, Anna Hudson and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain, behavior, & immunity - health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter A HallSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Geoffrey T FongSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Sara C HitchmanDepartment of Communication and Media Research, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Anne C K QuahDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Thomas AgarDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Gang MengDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Hasan AyazSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Drexel University, USA.
Bruce P DoreDesautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Mohammad N SakibSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Anna HudsonSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Christian BoudreauDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
University of Waterloo · CADrexel University · USMcGill University · CAOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CAUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vaccine hesitancy and inconsistent mitigation behavior performance have been significant challenges throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. In Canada, despite relatively high vaccine availability and uptake, willingness to accept booster shots and maintain mitigation behaviors in the post-acute phase of COVID-19 remain uncertain. The aim of the Canadian COVID-19 Experiences Project (CCEP) is threefold: 1) to identify social-cognitive and neurocognitive predictors of mitigation behaviors, 2) to identify optimal communication strategies to promote vaccination and mitigation behaviors, and 3) to examine brain health outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection and examine their longevity. Methods: The CCEP is comprised of two components: a conventional population survey (Study 1) and a functionally interconnected laboratory study (Study 2). Study 1 will involve 6 waves of data collection. Wave 1, completed between 28 September and 21 October 2021, recruited 1,958 vaccine-hesitant (49.8%) and fully vaccinated (50.2%) adults using quota sampling to ensure maximum statistical power. Measures included a variety of social cognitive (e.g., beliefs, intentions) and neurocognitive (e.g., delay discounting) measures, followed by an opportunity to view and rate a set of professionally produced COVID-19 public service announcement (PSA) videos for perceived efficacy. Study 2 employs the same survey items and PSAs but coupled with lab-based eye tracking and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to directly quantify neural indicators of attention capture and self-reflection in a smaller community sample. In the final phase of the project, subjective impressions and neural indicators of PSA efficacy will be compared and used to inform recommendations for construction of COVID-19 PSAs into the post-acute phase of the pandemic. Discussion: The CCEP provides a framework for evaluating effective COVID-19 communication strategies by levering conventional population surveys and the latest eye-tracking and brain imaging metrics. The CCEP will also yield important information about the brain health impacts of SARS-CoV-2 in the general population, in relation to current and future virus variants as they emerge.

Indexed as

BehaviorCOVID-19MitigationPreventionSARS-CoV-2Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID35527791
PMCPMC9060711
OpenAlexW4225325589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.